Henry S. Thompson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dan Brickley writes: > >> HST wrote: > >>> I did say 'to some extent'. A photograph of a painting of George V >>> surely depicts George V, and an MP3 of a wax cylinder of a player >>> piano roll of Rubenstein playing the Hammerklavier is still a >>> rendering of the Hammerklavier. >> Only if you assume total coverage of the content of the >> original. Eg. thumbnail images don't depict everything that the source >> image depicts (we went around that block in FOAF). > > Hmm? What _does_ a thumbnail of an JPEG (of a) photograph of the > Eiffel tower depict, if not the Eiffel tower? If you show it to 1000 > people, and as them what it is, I'll bet you all but the most > obstreperous geeks (and Fair Witnesses :-) will say "(a picture of) > the Eiffel Tower". Are they all wrong? Many automatic thumbnail algorithms (eg. flickr's) cut out a square from the original rectangle, and so may omit content from the original. So they don't necessarily depict everything that the original depicted. DanReceived on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 13:26:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:53:10 GMT