W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [httpRange-14]: New Draft Finding "Dereferencing HTTP URIs"

From: Ed Davies <edavies@nildram.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:45:22 +0100
Message-ID: <465FEAB2.1000500@nildram.co.uk>
To: www-tag@w3.org
CC: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>

Would it be a fair summary of this finding to say that
a 303 response to an attempt to access someURI with a
location field set to someOtherURI and the assertion:

<someURI>
   <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso>
     <someOtherURI> .

are equivalent?

After all, "See Other" and "seeAlso" look pretty similar.

If that's a reasonable way to look at it, why not make
them formally equivalent?  I.e., describe the equivalence
in the finding.  rdfs:seeAlso doesn't have much meaning
anyway but it might be helpful if many people stored
these responses in the same way.

Ed Davies.
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 09:46:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:52 UTC