Re: [httpRange-14]: New Draft Finding "Dereferencing HTTP URIs"

From: Ed Davies <edavies@nildram.co.uk> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 10:45:22 +0100 Message-ID: <465FEAB2.1000500@nildram.co.uk> To: www-tag@w3.org CC: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:06 GMT

Would it be a fair summary of this finding to say that
a 303 response to an attempt to access someURI with a
location field set to someOtherURI and the assertion:

<someURI>
   <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#seeAlso>
     <someOtherURI> .

are equivalent?

After all, "See Other" and "seeAlso" look pretty similar.

If that's a reasonable way to look at it, why not make
them formally equivalent?  I.e., describe the equivalence
in the finding.  rdfs:seeAlso doesn't have much meaning
anyway but it might be helpful if many people stored
these responses in the same way.

Ed Davies.