W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2007

Re: [httpRange-14]: New Draft Finding "Dereferencing HTTP URIs"

From: Ed Davies <edavies@nildram.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:09:48 +0100
Message-ID: <46ADE31C.5080709@nildram.co.uk>
To: www-tag@w3.org

On 2007-06-06 I wrote:
> On reflection, I'm starting to wonder if treating 303 as
> being equivalent to any sort of functional property is a
> bad idea.  This is because it is a relationship between
> the original _URI_ and some destination resource, not the
> original _resource_.  Two URIs which refer to the same
> original resource can 303 to two different destination
> resources.  So, from the point of view of resources,
> 303 is a many-to-many relationship.  Therefore, modulo
> the issue with the destination possibly being a non-RDF
> resource, I'll go back to my original suggestion of
> rdf:seeAlso as the equivalent.

Commenting in the light of the more recent Terminology
Question monster thread, perhaps the same name should
be given to the resource referenced by a 303 as that by
a rdfs:seeAlso.
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 13:11:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:46 GMT