- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 23:30:42 -0400
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, www-tag@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com scripsit: > I'm not an NVDL expert, but my impression is that it's not focussed > primarily on such idioms. In summary, I have no problem pointing to NVDL > as an example of good practice for the things it does well; I would like > to avoid appearing in so doing to discourage use of languages in which > different versions share a namespace, or in which the same version of a > language freely mixes bits from many namespaces. Fortunately, RELAX NG handles both of those cases extremely well, and need not match on a particular element name any more than a particular namespace name: it can match a document on all of its content using an appropriately loose schema or by providing a union (choice) of schemas. -- Well, I have news for our current leaders John Cowan and the leaders of tomorrow: the Bill of cowan@ccil.org Rights is not a frivolous luxury, in force http://www.ccil.org/~cowan only during times of peace and prosperity. We don't just push it to the side when the going gets tough. --Molly Ivins
Received on Friday, 20 July 2007 03:30:47 UTC