- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 14:01:57 +0200
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Giovanni Tummarello <g.tummarello@gmail.com>, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>, Eyal Oren <eyal.oren@deri.org>
Julian Reschke wrote: > As far as the IETF errata "process" is concerned, it is already an > erratum -- the RFC Editor's errata page links to > <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/>, and over > there, the issue is recorded as > <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i71> (along > with Roy's proposed replacement text) Sorry, it's <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i70>. Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 12:02:21 UTC