W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2007

Re: XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0 -- Agenda item?

From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:03:43 -0500
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070129180343.GG1946@ccil.org> 

Anne van Kesteren scripsit:

> http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xbl-20070117/#semantics

That says only:

# The term "semantics" is used to refer to the intrinsic meaning or
# processing model of elements, attributes, events, and DOM interface
# members. Semantics are defined by specifications; for example, this
# specification defines the semantics of XBL elements.

So it defines "semantics" as either meaning or a processing model, but
fails to define "meaning" at all.

-- 
My confusion is rapidly waxing          John Cowan
For XML Schema's too taxing:            cowan@ccil.org
    I'd use DTDs                        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If they had local trees --
I think I best switch to RELAX NG.
Received on Monday, 29 January 2007 18:03:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 November 2011 15:42:42 GMT