W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2007

Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?)

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:28:38 +0100
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b4pnotnux.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

ht writes:

> Could you expand a bit?  The phrase "walled garden" gets used a lot,
> but I guess I'm not clear what actual force it's meant to convey. . .

Reply has come there none in this thread, but I note the topic has
been taken up in public elsewhere [1], and I _think_ the first message in
that thread expands on the "walled garden" point, although it doesn't
use that phrase.

ht


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/0279.html
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGG4L2kjnJixAXWBoRAusYAJsGdf1tvAii3ARzWfuk6RK0h1+z3QCeMq5s
oI/6MgdW8tGSIh4cQgGbiYc=
=uPh+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 12:29:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:45 GMT