- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:38:36 +0200
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, www-tag@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, public-xg-mmsem@w3.org, newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com
On 10 Apr 2007, at 03:50, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > >> I would recommend that each document be available in both HTML and >> RDF using content negotiation or just RDF with a style sheet that >> makes it legible, or just HTML with GRDDL. > > -1 for content negotiation. (very un-semantic web like to have non- > inspectable communications, and confusion about what a name=URI means) Not a fair characterization of conneg. It would be implemented by having the (required!) 303 redirect point to either an HTML or RDF document based on client preferences. As Chimezie says, the HTML and RDF documents should point to each other. Thus all communications are inspectable, and it's clear what the names mean -- there's one for the domain object, one for the HTML document, one for the RDF document. > +1 for RDF + style sheet. (very semantic-web like to have knowledge > first, and presentation separated) -1 for this option as it doesn't work for Google and friends. Richard > > My 2c. > > -Alan >
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2007 10:38:55 UTC