RE: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?)

In the case that was raised, I'd say that it was a bit more than what
Noah mentioned.  I'd say that HTML is *the* key vocabulary as it's the
container, and knowing it's version is truly useful.  Knowing it's HTML
as the "root" of a compound document is more interesting than knowing
it's HTML as part of a compound document - one example being WS-RP
messages which are SOAP messages containing HTML for portals.

Cheers,
Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of Mark Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:47 PM
> To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version 
> information? (XMLVersioning-41?)
> 
> 
> On 4/3/07, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com 
> <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Yes, of course.  In a typical HTML compound document page, HTML is 
> > indeed one of the key vocabularies, and knowing it's 
> version is truly useful.
> 
> I'm curious, Noah (and David); what would that be useful for, 
> whether in a compound document or not?
> 
> Mark.
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 05:04:54 UTC