W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2006

Re: Drilling on the persistence problem

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:19:24 -0500
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1159294764.5616.763.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 19:04 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
[...]
> 6) AmpleX succeed in a hostile takeover of ExampleCorp, and
>    intentionally arrange http://www.example.org/* to be 404, because
>    they want to stamp out the name.
> 
> Does this cover the major failure scenarios that are of concern?

One failure mode I don't see is:

 obj.html becomes wildly popular and ExampleCorp's servers melt down
  or otherwise can't service the demand

and another nearby one is:

 obj.html becomes wildly popular and ExampleCorp doesn't want to
  pay for enough bandwidth to satisfy the demand, even though
  their servers could handle it



> ht
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/URNsAndRegistries-50

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 18:19:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:42 GMT