W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2006

Re: Short namespace URIs for W3C TRs available

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:01:10 +0100
Message-ID: <44FFEDE6.7030406@danbri.org>
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, Chairs@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org

Mark Baker wrote:
> 
> Ian - a late comment, I know.  Just tossing it out there ...
> 
> On 9/6/06, Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>> As before, a trailing "/" MAY be used and does not require Director
>> approval.
> 
> It seems to me that the lack of a standard approach there may lead to
> confusion, as for each short name an author would also have to
> remember whether it also needed the trailing slash or not.
> 
> I think it would be better for the spec to pick an option, and say it
> SHOULD be used, e.g. "A trailing slash SHOULD be used, but choosing
> not to use one does not require Director approval".
> 
> I don't have any strong opinions on which option should be used,
> though I suppose having no slash is cleaner, saves a character, and is
> consistent with existing W3C namespace naming practice (last time I
> looked).

It's important to at least allow the use of namespace URIs that end
without the / (or that end /# I suppose).

Sometimes there are deployment reasons for using a / over #, eg. very
large RDF namespaces where you want to do an HTTP GET on term URIs, and
not have the bit after the # ommitted by the HTTP library. For example,
see the Wordnet 2.0 representation hosted at
http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/
see working draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/wordnet-rdf/

cheers,

Dan

-- 
http://danbri.org/
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2006 09:58:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:42 GMT