Section 2.2 of The use of Metadata in URIs http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/metaDataInURI-31-20061107.html incites the manipulation of URLs to obtain access to resources which has not been specifically authorized. In the UK such access would be a contravention of the Computer Misuse Act 1990. I know it's idiotic, but there's case law to support it. Google for Daniel Cuthbert for a relevant case. Questions: 1. Should this TAG finding note this point? 2. Can a TAG finding define or change the meaning of a URL, an HTTP access or other protocol element in such a way as to change the interpretation of the law in a country? 3. Should a TAG finding define...? This is all rather silly but if the TAG can word this document in a way that makes it clear that not only is it true that: > Still, the ability to explore the Web informally and > experimentally is very valuable, and Web users act on > such guesses about URIs all the time. but also that it is an implicit part of running a web server to accept that such experimentation is legitimate then they'd be doing all of us a favour. Regards, Ed Davies.Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 16:50:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:42 GMT