W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2006

abstractComponentRefs-37 and a URI for the WSDL 2.0 interface for SPARQL

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:04:26 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1147367066.22658.570.camel@dirk.w3.org>

I took an action back in september to
seek clarification about
http://example.org/TicketAgent.wsdl20#wsdl.interface(TicketAgent)

http://www.w3.org/2005/09/21-tagmem-minutes.html#action09

I did ask the WSDL WG in...

RE: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Sep/0056

and the answer is that yes,

http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#wsdl.interface(SparqlQuery)

is a URI for the SPARQL interface defined in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl

Hmm... odd that we don't publish the .wsdl file as the namespace
document; we do publish an HTML document that will help people find it.

I wonder what impact, if any, this should have on the
draft finding
  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030

Dave, any thoughts? (or are you on holiday? I forget.)


Anyway... so that's what I've done for this action. I thought I
had delcared victory on this in a TAG meeting a while ago, but
I can't confirm from records. Besides... it seems perhaps worth
discussing. I see that we almost got to it last
week (http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/05/09-agenda.html ). Vincent,
please consider it for the agenda of our 16 May meeting. Hmm...
it seems Dave Orchard isn't available that day. Maybe we can
do something useful even if he isn't there. Let's see what
email discussion, if any, we get between now and then.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:04:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:40 GMT