W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2006

Re: CURIEs: A proposal

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 08:11:16 -0500
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1151413877.16839.509.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 14:58 +0200, Steven Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 14:46:47 +0200, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:33 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote:
> > [...]
> >> So it seems to me that you're happy with the earlier point that CURIEs
> >> is "a way of abbreviating URIs"?
> >
> > No.
> 
> I don't understand. That is the aim of CURIEs. What is there to disagree  
> with?

I disagree that a system where "Each language must specify... [a variety
of options, in prose]"[2Jun] is one implementable algorithm
for abbreviating URIs.


[2Jun]  CURIEs: A proposal, 2 June 2006
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Jun/0007.html

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:11:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:41 GMT