RE: CURIEs: A proposal

Hi Karl,

I was not discussing URI syntax.  I was explaining that these 
vocabularies and codes are in widespread use and was using Google 
search to demonstrate this.  While a search for each of the 
strings on the left-hand side does yield many hits, these hits 
include resources related to the entities I listed on the right-
hand side.

Regards,
Misha
------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------
http://www.iptc.org         | http://www.iptc.org/std-dev/NAR/1.0
http://www.iptc.org/std-dev | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] 
Sent: 14 June 2006 02:21
To: Misha Wolf
Cc: Dan Connolly; www-tag@w3.org; newsml-2@yahoogroups.com; public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Subject: Re: CURIEs: A proposal


Le 06-06-14 à 07:01, Misha Wolf a écrit :
> Simply a restatement of the position that the codes themselves
> must be left as is.  To see why, try any of these in Google:
>
>    CUSIP 037833100    -> Apple Computer
>    SEDOL 0263494      -> BAE Systems
>    Valoren 1203203    -> UBS
>    ISBN 0-321-18578-1 -> The Unicode Standard
>    ISSN 0261-3077     -> The Guardian
>    ISO 4217 392       -> Japanese Yen

I do not have the same answers AND more I do not have one answer but  
a list of links going on multiple web pages when I have tried on
	http://www.alltheweb.com/
	http://www.av.com/
	http://www.google.com/

I'm not sure the result of a search can be considered as an  
identifier. Or I have missed something in this thread.

This is for example a possible identifier
	http://worldcatlibraries.org/wcpa/isbn/0-321-18578-1
These work too (which are used often. Unfortunately, but you talked  
about real world)
	http://www.amazon.co.jp/gp/product/0321185781/
	http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0321185781/
Or these ones?
	http://isbn.nu/0-321-18578-1
	http://isbn.nu/0321185781


	
-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***


To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.

Received on Wednesday, 14 June 2006 12:02:34 UTC