- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:32:50 -0500
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Dave Orchard writes: > Further, does the implication of Noah's advice mean that the > default for a specification is that URIs in documents do not > indicate concepts? Maybe, but I wasn't intending to go quite that far. I was only saying that in this case, we have the opportunity to have two separate URIs: 1) A URI that refers to the class that contains all the MEPs for SOAP (we'd have to decide whether that's all possible MEPs or just the ones actually called out in W3C Recs.) 2) A URI for the section in the SOAP Rec that introduces the concept of MEPs I was suggesting that in this particular case the costs of separating them are low, and the value potentially significant. I think that will often be true in other similar cases, but I wasn't saying anything about default assumptions, legitimate exceptions, etc. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 18:33:26 UTC