W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Confusion on httpRange-14 decision (fragmentInXML-28, RDFinXHTML-35, abstractComponentRefs-37)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:43:14 -0600
To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1140565395.26363.588.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 14:24 -0500, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
wrote:
>  To: The TAG
>  From: The Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment Working Group
> 
> SYNOPSIS:
> Is it okay to have the same URI identify both a location within an HTML
> document and a concept in an ontology?  What is the class of
> "information resources"?  Would the TAG wish to define a URI for it?  Is
> it owl:disjointWith anything?  What can be concluded if an HTTP response
> code is other than 2xx, 4xx or 303?


To re-iterate what I said in another mailing list:

[[
I don't think the TAG endorses what I'm doing there.

The most relevant TAG issues are still open.
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#fragmentInXML-28
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues#abstractComponentRefs-37

I'm starting to think that the profile attribute is key:
if you get an HTML representation of /baseballplayers
with <div id="peterose"> then baseballplayers#peterose
identifies that div element, unless the author says otherwise
using the <head profile> element.

This is a post-hoc refinement of the html media types
and the XHTML specs; i.e. I think those specs should
be ammendmended to specify this practice.
]]
 -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Feb/0010
  Fri, 03 Feb 2006 08:41:30 -0600

I think the questions you ask are interesting, David, but
httpRange-14 is closed and I don't see much motivation to
re-open it. Better to connect this discussion to other issues.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 23:43:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:38 GMT