Re: terminology section and diagram for ext/versioning

On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:13 -0800, David Orchard wrote:
[text and a diagram]

Is that diagram the same one I saw a while ago? Ah... yes,
it is. So it corresponds to the .violet that you sent before.

I just checked them in and generated RDF:

http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.png
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.violet
revision 1.1
date: 2006/02/14 17:36:59;  author: connolly;  state: Exp;
from DO Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:48:35 -0800 , Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:13:26
-0800


and I'm starting to review it w.r.t. some earlier work
I did on change policies...

[VM] formally defining W3C's namespace change policy options w.r.t.
recent TAG versioning terminology
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0136

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/changePolicy.n3

Darn; telcon in 4 minutes... and I'm scribing...

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 17:57:30 UTC