Re: RDDL natures: for the record

On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Jonathan Borden wrote:
[...]
> Moreover, DanC was heard to say that he can't endorse RDDL because 
> http://www.rddl.org/nature returns 404 --- WTF???
>
> http://www.rddl.org/natures gives you back a document describing RDDL 
> natures.
>
> http://www.rddl.org/#nature gives you one of the locations in the RDDL 
> spec where rddl:nature is described.
>
> What made anyone thing that http://www.rddl.org/nature was supposed to 
> resolve?????????
>
> Am I seriously missing something?

Maybe I am.

We were sketching RDF stuff and I asked what rddl: in rddl:nature
expanded to, and I was told http://www.rddl.org/ , so I asked
what the web says about http://www.rddl.org/nature , and we got a 404.

If rddl: is supposed to expand to http://www.rddl.org/# , then that's 
different.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/