Jonathan Borden wrote: eople should have a look at http://www.rddl.org/20050704/ for a > look at what we are proposing as a new version of RDDL -- it is > intended to be backward compatible with the current RDDL, but also > allows the form <a rddl:purpose="..." rddl:nature="..."> instead of the > <rddl:resource> form which uses XLink. In the tradition of RDDL I am > hoping to get a final version of this out soon, so comments are welcome > for folks who haven't seen this yet. > The internal links from the TOC seem broken. I'm not sure why. Hmm, it looks like section 7 ios completely missing: 7. RDDL Attributes 1. rddl:nature 2. rddl:purpose is in the TOC but not in the spec so it's hard to comment on this. :-) -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/Received on Sunday, 10 December 2006 10:52:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:04 GMT