- From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:52:28 -0500
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org, XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Jonathan Borden wrote:
eople should have a look at http://www.rddl.org/20050704/ for a
> look at what we are proposing as a new version of RDDL -- it is
> intended to be backward compatible with the current RDDL, but also
> allows the form <a rddl:purpose="..." rddl:nature="..."> instead of the
> <rddl:resource> form which uses XLink. In the tradition of RDDL I am
> hoping to get a final version of this out soon, so comments are welcome
> for folks who haven't seen this yet.
>
The internal links from the TOC seem broken. I'm not sure why. Hmm, it
looks like section 7 ios completely missing:
7. RDDL Attributes
1. rddl:nature
2. rddl:purpose
is in the TOC but not in the spec so it's hard to comment on this. :-)
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/
Received on Sunday, 10 December 2006 10:52:39 UTC