- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:13:03 -0700
- To: W3C-TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
Can you point out anything that is broken by this? Enough to justify changing the Web? If you want to change some theoretical background material about URIs, fine; if you want to change how software works, e.g., disallowing relative URIs (the most obvious use of hierarchy in the deployed Web) you might encounter some resistance. Cheers, On 2006/08/26, at 7:46 AM, Fernando Franco wrote: > URIs are names. > Names are not hierarchical. > Ergo, URIs should not be hierarchical. > > URIs should not be hierarchical. > URIs have a hierarchical part. > Ergo, URIs are wrong. > > > Fernando Franco -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Monday, 28 August 2006 18:13:47 UTC