Can you point out anything that is broken by this? Enough to justify changing the Web? If you want to change some theoretical background material about URIs, fine; if you want to change how software works, e.g., disallowing relative URIs (the most obvious use of hierarchy in the deployed Web) you might encounter some resistance. Cheers, On 2006/08/26, at 7:46 AM, Fernando Franco wrote: > URIs are names. > Names are not hierarchical. > Ergo, URIs should not be hierarchical. > > URIs should not be hierarchical. > URIs have a hierarchical part. > Ergo, URIs are wrong. > > > Fernando Franco -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.comReceived on Monday, 28 August 2006 18:13:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 13:53:06 GMT