Avoid@gmail wrote: > From: http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2006-08-09.html#T08-01-12 > > <Biblio> in many programming languages, in HTML, etc, we normally have to > choose some way to escape content. question: wouldn't it be better to define > say 5 or 10 extra, arbitrary characters, just to use them as universal > escaping characters? Such characters already exist. Formats that use special sequences of "normal" characters have already proven more successful.Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 17:17:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:12 GMT