Re: Another Draft of TAG position on use of unregistered media types in W3C Recommendations

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:25 -0700, T.V Raman wrote:
> 
> *I agree with you on both your primary points, A) that we owe a
>  reply quickly --- and B) that the disagreement is minor.
> 
> However, as I've stated a few times during the call, I've
> experienced this kind of situation from "the other side " as it
> were, namely from inside WGs trying to get  out a working,
> implementable specification, and in that context, I believe that
> as a ground-rule we as the TAG should only say "dont do X" if we
> have a reasonable "Do Y instead" proposal.

Please suggest some text that would address your concern.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E