W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2005

Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-maes-lemonade-http-binding-02.txt

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:26:42 -0500
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1127874403.6446.206.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 20:11 -0400, Mark Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:47:19PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > [...] the correct way to implement IMAP via
> > HTTP is to simply use HTTP on a virtual mapping of resources.
> > The two protocols have almost identical capabilities, so the
> > only translation needed is to map the stateful interaction of
> > IMAP to appropriate resource states in HTTP and then extend
> > HTTP's authentication to include IMAP's mechanisms.
> 
> +1

FWIW, I implemented such a mapping, in part. It puts up
a form where you can give an IMAP query and get
results in HTML or in RDF; links from the HTML take you to
messages or message parts.


[[
This is a sort of IMAP<->HTTP proxy service.

It's limited to my way of using IMAP
(in particular, I archive all mail in Archive/YYYY-MMWW
mailboxes. WW is week number).

v 1.7 2002/02/12 15:07:04
]]
http://www.w3.org/2000/04/maillog2rdf/mid_proxy.py

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 28 September 2005 02:26:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:36 GMT