W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2005

Re: EndpointRefs-47

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:38:08 +0100
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bll0o4m8f.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

noah_mendelsohn writes:

> Henry Thompson asks:
>
>> Why not use the following URI to identify that endpoint:
>> 
>>   http://example.com/fabrikam/acct?fabrikam:CustomerKey=412

> I feel like I'm missing something.  This proposal seems to take the 
> namespace prefix, which has almost no semantic significance in the EPR, 
> and makes it the qualifier for the query string parameter in the URI.>

The suggestion made at the f2f, as I understood it, was to allow
only the prefixes which were bound in the WSDL description identified
by the primary URI, i.e. http://example.com/fabrikam/acct.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDV1d0kjnJixAXWBoRAjNmAJ4qLsHG5/6digUKgCl04bwTJDH13ACdGBIX
ct6YYI1lgJSFyD7uhbWbDv4=
=xsog
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2005 08:38:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:46 UTC