Re: minutes TAG 8 Nov for review: namespaceDocument-8, XMLVersioning-41, etc.

On Nov 16, 2005, at 13:25, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> We have received no comments on this. Does this mean that RDDL 1.0  
> vs. RDDL 2.0 is really a non-issue, or is it worth updating RDDL to  
> allow a simpler authoring style? Or is it that my July 4th weekend  
> work got lost in the summer sun...

FWIW I think it's very much worth doing. The XLink version is too  
cryptic to people who don't already have an experience with RDDL (or  
links beyond XHTML href).

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 14:09:24 UTC