W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2005

Re: SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:42:52 +0300
Message-Id: <c80e053f27a8124471355234e7c85f9b@nokia.com>
Cc: David Wood <dwood@mindswap.org>, www-tag@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
To: "ext Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>

On Mar 27, 2005, at 22:20, ext Tim Berners-Lee wrote:

> Could the SWBPWG please answer also answer the following:

I'm not a member of SWBPWG, but I'll hazard a response
(even though I don't see how this moves us closer to
closure of this issue)...

> 1. Who was the creator <http://www.w3.org/2005/moby/dick> ?

If you mean, who was the creator of the resource identified
by the URI "http://www.w3.org/2005/moby/dick", and if we
trust the information accessible via that URI, then we might
conclude, based on the representation returned, that the URI
identifies a "book" and that a person by the name of "Herman
Melville" was the creator of the "book" identified by that URI.
But that is just an educated guess, and possibly incorrect.
After all, the content of the representation returned could be
inaccurate, or even contain one or more deliberate falsehoods.

If you mean, who was the creator of the URI itself, then that
information is not reliably available in any information accessible
via that URI, though one might presume that the creator was
the owner of the domain www.w3.org, or some authorized agent of
the domain owner. We might even guess that the creator of the
URI was you, and probably be correct. But again, that might also
be quite wrong. It's a guess at best.

> 2. What is the year of creation of <http://www.w3.org/2005/moby/dick> ?

If you mean the "book", then no such information is accessible
via that URI. One might utilize the information accessible
via that URI to research an answer via some other sources
of information, presuming that the resource in question, the
"book", is actually unambiguously identified.

If you mean the URI itself, then, again, technically, no
such information is available -- though one might opt to
exercise bad practice and conclude from the lexical nature
of the URI itself, and perhaps some proprietary knowledge of
W3C naming conventions, that the URI was created in 2005.
But again, that would be nothing more than a guess.

If you mean the representation accessible via that URI,
then the HTTP headers at least suggest that the representation
was created prior to the Last-Modified: date of
"Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:54:36 GMT", which is probably reliable
information -- but the actual creation year of the
representation remains unclear.

> 3. Who was the creator <http://www.w3.org/2005/moby/xyz> ?

No idea.

The representation returned appears to be a poem, so perhaps
the URI identifies a poem. But then, it might identify a web
page containing a poem, or a particular translation of a poem,
or not a poem at all, but perhaps it is a representation of
the state of a horde of drunken elves firmly convinced of the
acceptability of using URIs without hashes to identify RDF
properties (who knows... ;-)

> 4. What is the year of creation of <http://www.w3.org/2005/moby/xyz> ?

No idea.


Now, having gone through that "exercise"...

None of the questions above are questions that can be reliably answered
at the web layer -- because the web layer simply does not care what 
URIs actually identify and provides no specific machinery or 
whatsoever to communicate what those URIs actually identify (true, the
representations accessible via those URIs may provide answers to those
questions, but typically will not). The web layer certainly
*does* care that those URIs identify *something* and that there are
accessible representations of those *somethings*, and humans will care
about the utility of the representations accessible and consistency of
representations (but most humans won't care either what the URIs
acutually identify).

Furthermore, the very form of the questions introduces ambiguity as
to what you refer to -- i.e. the resource identified (denoted) by the
URI, or the information accessible via that URI, or the web experience
associated with that URI, or any indirect subject or concept related to
any of the above, etc. etc.

It is simply not possible to know what resources those URIs actually
identify by dereferencing them -- per traditional HTTP methods -- and
any attempts to answer your questions are guesses (perhaps intelligent
guesses, perhaps correct guesses, but guesses nonetheless).

And none of those guesses are made any more reliable or accurate
by whether (a) the URIs contain or don't contain hashes or (b) the
URIs are or are not constrained to identify "information resources".


While some members of the SWBP WG might choose to attempt to dereference
the above URIs and make intelligent guesses about the most likely 
to the questions you pose, such an activity would have no relevance to
the position that URIs without hashes MAY identify RDF properties.


Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2005 09:43:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:33 GMT