W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Revisiting namespaceDocument-8

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:34:57 +0200
To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <42d4cc3a.36135500@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Jonathan Borden wrote:
>>It seems
>>
>>  http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/
>>  http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.rddl.org/rddl2.html
>>
>>both documents are not standards-compliant. Could this be fixed please?
>
>What standard doesn't it comply to?

I suspect it does not comply with the set of standards that define legal
content for use with the text/html media type. RFC 2854 does not seem to
mention RDDL but notes that text/html is defined by W3C Recommendations;
is there some W3C Recommendations that allows use of the text/html media
type for RDDL?
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 22:35:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:36 GMT