W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2005

RE: on Extending and Versioning draft findings

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:50:49 -0600
To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
Cc: David Orchard <David.Orchard@BEA.com>, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1106596249.5075.59.camel@localhost>

On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 18:09 +0000, Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
wrote:
> Hello Dan, 
> 
> > I note "It is heavily XML schema based, but only because of 
> > scheduling.
> > OWL/RDF and RelaxNG sections wil be added" which makes me 
> > think perhaps I should have waited until those sections were 
> > added to commit to a review. But pressing on...
> 
> I'm wonder whether the application of E&V principles to OWL/RDF falls
> within the scope of the Semantic Web Best Practices WG.

Yes, they have a "vocabulary management" task force.
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/VM/

So there's some overlap, just like with the XML Schema WG, etc.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 24 January 2005 19:50:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:31 GMT