Norm: Thanks for doing this. One suggested correction before we formally accept the minutes. Regarding one quote from me: <asMinuted> The Schema WG feels that they have some ownership over the extensibility and versioning issue. But they also see that it's a much larger issue. </asMinuted> <whatITriedToSayontheCall> The Schema WG feels that they have some ownership over the extensibility and versioning issue especially in relation to the W3C XML Schema Recommendation and secondarily regarding XML as a whole. They also agree that it's a larger issue that goes beyond one schema language; indeed the TAG's interest may extend beyond XML (e.g. RDF versioning, etc.). </whatITriedToSayontheCall> If it can be fixed without too much trouble I think it's worth doing, as ownership of the versioning problem seems to be a tricky issue. If it's a lot of trouble, you can let it go, and this entry in the email archives will serve as a secondary record. Thanks. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2005 13:51:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:05 GMT