W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2004

"AWWW, 20040816 release, sections 1 and 2" seems editorial

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:08:37 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1096301316.24259.392.camel@dirk>
In our 13 Sep telcon, I took an action to propose a
response to

"AWWW, 20040816 release, sections 1 and 2"
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004JulSep/0059.html

I just looked them over for the 2nd time, and while I'm inclined
to incorporate many of the smaller suggestions, they seem editorial.

So I'm actually not proposing any substantive changes in response
to this comment after all.

Norm, is it straightforward for you to reply to this comment,
saying which comments you integrated and which ones you didn't?


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 27 September 2004 16:07:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:28 GMT