RE: "information resource"

Rather than simply saying "OK, that's good", in the interest of
keeping things crystal clear and avoiding any undue confusion,
can we be a bit pedantic here and can you resend the proposal
with the corrected wording, and then I can say "OK" to the
clean, corrected version?

That should also provide for a better reference link as well.

Patrick

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
> ext Stuart Williams
> Sent: 21 September, 2004 18:05
> To: Stickler Patrick (Nokia-TP-MSW/Tampere)
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: "information resource"
> 
> 
> 
> Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> <snip/>
> 
> >>>
> >>> "The term Web Resource is applicable to resources for which web 
> >>>acesssible representations are available and/or which may be 
> >>>interacted 
> >>>with through an exchange of representations. Any resource 
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>that has a 
> >>    
> >>
> >>>representation is an information resource."
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >Oops. Sorry. I missed this change from the earlier proposal.
> >
> >Did you mean to have here "... Any resource that has a representation
> >is a web resource".
> >
> >  
> >
> Yes indeed ... cut and paste error on my part.
> 
> Stuart
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2004 07:24:38 UTC