W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2004

Re: Information resources?

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 15:20:28 -0400
Message-Id: <200409091920.i89JKSo7029219@roke.hawke.org>
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
cc: www-tag@w3.org


> |> Assertions that http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Hoary_Marmot is a web
> |> page or has a particular creator or last modified date or
> |> what-have-you are inconsistent.
> |
> | This seems to me the crux -- on what basis do you assert they are
> | inconsistent?
> 
> I'm appealing to your experience. Given two assertions:
> 
>   http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Hoary_Marmot is_a "Hoary Marmot"
>   http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Hoary_Marmot is_a "web page"
> 
> Your undertanding of what it means to be a Hoary Marmot (in particular
> that all such things belong to each of the following classes of
> things: marmots, rodents, gnawing animals, placental mammals,
> eutherian mammals, mammals, vertibrates, craniates, chordates,
> animals, organisms, living things, animate things, and physical
> objects) will lead you to conclude that those assertions are
> inconsistent.
> 
> I could have made some additional statements to express explicitly
> that the set of hoary marmots and the set of web pages are disjoint,
> but I didn't bother.
> 
> | How might I have figure that out for myself? 
> 
> You, the human being, relies on wetware. A machine is going to rely
> on...something else. The trick is not to make assertions that you
> can't prove, I suppose.
> 
> | How might
> | my search engine have figure it out for _itself_?
> 
> I have no idea.

Did my earlier message [1] sketch this out well enough, or would you
like my approach documented in more detail?   I don't actually have
owl:disjointWith reasoning and web-retrieval in the same code base
yet, but I could explain how they would fit together.

       -- sandro

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Sep/0074.html
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2004 19:18:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:28 GMT