Quoting "Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>: > Yes. A "web resource" is a subclass of "resource". > > A "resource" is a "resource". > A "web resource" is a "resource". > A "representation" is a "resource". No, a representation is a resource only if there is a URI (or perhaps an RDF BNode) for the represetation. Most of the time there isn't. It's still a thing though, so it could potentially be a resource. It's URI would not be the same as the URI of the resource it represents. > > The difference between the web and semantic web layer is > > whether having *any* > > understanding of what that resource is an AI-complete problem or not. > > I think I agree with that ;-) We've agreed twice in one day. Maybe I'm not feeling well or something ;) -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book." - Groucho MarxReceived on Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:43:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:54 GMT