- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 11:57:06 +0100
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Quoting "Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>: > A "web resource" is significant to the web layer. > A "resource" is significant to the semantic web layer. To my mind a resource is a resource. If it has a URI it is a resource, and it is the same resource whatever technology is using the URI (otherwise the U and I don't hold). The difference between the web and semantic web layer is whether having *any* understanding of what that resource is an AI-complete problem or not. > Whether the term itself is "web resource" or "booga" or "pumpkin", > should still be a matter of discussion (as long as the term is *not* > "information resource" ;-) Can't say that I favour "pumpkin" ;) -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a ConceptualWork about a duck." - Mark Baker
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2004 10:57:11 UTC