Quoting "Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com" <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>: > A "web resource" is significant to the web layer. > A "resource" is significant to the semantic web layer. To my mind a resource is a resource. If it has a URI it is a resource, and it is the same resource whatever technology is using the URI (otherwise the U and I don't hold). The difference between the web and semantic web layer is whether having *any* understanding of what that resource is an AI-complete problem or not. > Whether the term itself is "web resource" or "booga" or "pumpkin", > should still be a matter of discussion (as long as the term is *not* > "information resource" ;-) Can't say that I favour "pumpkin" ;) -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably not a ConceptualWork about a duck." - Mark BakerReceived on Thursday, 9 September 2004 10:57:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:54 GMT