Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2004, at 8:10 PM, Mark Baker wrote: >> >> ... >> I continue to maintain that "information resource" is a pointless >> concept. > > > So do I, but I removed my objection to including it in webarch on > condition that the reason for the definition also be provided, so > that folks who don't care for the reason won't have to worry about it. I hope that's the case. Frankly this entire exercise smacks of SUO or Cyc - classification of resources is not an area ripe for specification. I like it bettere when the TAG focuses on establishing engineering and architectural guidelines for the Web, not models of the universe. cheers BillReceived on Sunday, 17 October 2004 14:06:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:55 GMT