W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2004

RE: minutes Basel ftf 5-7 Oct 2004 for review

From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:30:04 +0100
Message-ID: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC9396B9E@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>

Hello Dan,

Thanks... 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
> Sent: 11 October 2004 17:11
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: minutes Basel ftf 5-7 Oct 2004 for review
> 
> TAG members, please review:
> 
>   Basel Meeting of the W3C Technical Architecture Group, 5-7 Sep 2004
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag
>   created by Stuart Williams, TAG co-chair
>   DRAFT minutes by Dan Connolly
>   with thanks to the scribes: Noah Mendelsohn, Norm Walsh, Chris
Lilley,
>   Tim Berners-Lee, Roy Fielding, Paul Cotton
>   $Revision: 1.33 $ of $Date: 2004/10/11 15:55:42 $
> 
> In particular, Stuart, TimBL, Norm, I need some help with the 
> administrative section:
> 
> | Stuart offered regrets for 15th and 22nd Nov; NDW offered to chair
15 
> | and 22 Nov @@huh? I thought NDW was globe-trotting for most of Nov.

As as a record of the meeting that matches my recollections... that Norm
offered to chair for 15th and 22nd Nov.

As for NDW globe-trotting, I don't recall a mention. Norm could you let
us know if it is a problem?

> | @@was TimBL also unable to comfirm in-person attendance?

I believe that that is also a correct record of what was said at the
meeting. 

If TimBL is able to be clearer about his availablity I'm sure that would
be helpful... but I don't recall him being able to be that clear in the
meeting.

> 
> | @@the agenda said: Minutes from 19 July? @@

That was a mistake in the agenda... we had approved them previously. We
accepted the meeting record for 27th Sept [1] although hyperlink in the
agenda I posted was wrong. Roy asked whether a correction he had sent
had been handled. This lead to a small discussion of whether or not
threaded responses to email minutes were adequate for updating the
meeting record (given that we cannot the edit the minutes attached to
the message posting them). We agreed that threaded responses were
adequate.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Sep/0170.html


Does that clear those up?
Received on Monday, 11 October 2004 16:30:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:43 UTC