W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2004

RE: Draft minutes TAG f2f 5 October 2004, basel, Switzerland.

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:11:48 -0700
Message-ID: <33D970235519324D988AFFDE7EA2E24C028FEEF8@RED-MSG-41.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>

+1 on these changes.

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of
> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Sent: October 8, 2004 2:32 PM
> To: Chris Lilley
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Draft minutes TAG f2f 5 October 2004, basel, Switzerland.
> 
> Here are a few suggested corrections to the portion of the minutes
that I
> Scribed on morning of Oct-5.
> 
> In the discussion of work on versioning and schemas:
> 
> <current>
> PC: Right, it's Noah's headache now. He's on schema.
> </current>
> 
> In retrospect, a more accurate scribing of Paul's comment might be:
> 
> <proposed>
> PC: Noah's in a good position to help with Schema WG liaison now that
he's
> on both TAG and Schema.
> </proposed>
> 
> The original scribing could have been misinterpreted as suggesting
that I
> take over David Orchard's leadership role on the versioning finding.
That
> wasn't discussed, I don't think it's what was intended, and FWIW I'm
not
> particularly anxious for that to happen.  Dave's doing a great job,
IMO,
> though of course I'll be glad to help where I can.
> 
> Typo:
> <current>
> "A specification should devote the benefits or costs of providing
> extensibility"
> </current>
> <proposed>
> "A specification should discuss the benefits or costs of providing
> extensibility"
> </proposed>
> 
> 
> Typo:
> <current>
> "should the keywords in Query be extensibility"
> </current>
> <proposed>
> "should the keywords in Query be extendable?"
> </proposed>
> 
> I note that in the latter part of the minutes, Chris entered: "scribe
> norm", but norm scribed under the nom de plume "normndw".  Is it worth
> rerunning the HTML generator after zapping that?
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
> 10/05/2004 12:05 PM
> Please respond to Chris Lilley
> 
> 
>         To:     www-tag@w3.org
>         cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>         Subject:        Draft minutes TAG f2f 5 October 2004, basel,
> Switzerland.
> 
> 
> Hello www-tag,
> 
>   Minutes attached.
> 
> --
>  Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
>  Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
>  Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 20:12:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:43 UTC