Re: Reviewed charmod fundamentals

At 19:28 04/03/12 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:

>At 18:05 12/03/04 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
>>My understanding is that both URI (2396bis) and IRI are 'in the queue'
>>for the RFC editor, who can fix up the normative reference from IRI to
>>2396bis once the latter is assigned an RFC number.
>
>As far as I'm aware (and I have been following the discussion) RFC2396bis 
>has not yet been last-called, so should not yet be in the RFC editor's queue.
>
>I can't speak to IRIs.

Same for IRIs.

Regards,    Martin.