W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2004

Re: Reviewed charmod fundamentals

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:28:55 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20040321084546.05d4dcc8@localhost>
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org <www-tag@w3.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>

At 11:47 04/03/06 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:

>On Friday, March 5, 2004, 11:03:23 PM, Tim wrote:
>
>TB> Per my action item, I reviewed the charmod fundamentals doc, at
>
>TB>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-charmod-20040225

>TB> Er, can this doc go to recommendation with IRIs still uncooked?
>
>Well, its not going to Rec right now. Its a WD, and going to Last
>Call will be the next step,

Sorry, but the Character Model *is* currently in Last Call.

>then CR.
>
>WebArch was able to go to last call with 2396bis 'uncooked', referring
>to an Internet Draft rather than a standards track RFC because we
>preferred it;i see no reason that Charmod can't do the same.

Yes, in particular because IRI moving forward depends on 2396bis moving
forward, as we have already told the TAG in a last call comment on WebArch.

Regards,    Martin.
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2004 09:29:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:25 GMT