W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > March 2004

RE: [Agenda] 15 Mar 2004 TAG teleconf (Review of Charmod Fundamen tals, LC issues)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:22:30 -0600
To: Stuart Williams <skw@hp.com>
Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1079356950.30358.3757.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 03:58, Williams, Stuart wrote:
> Hello Ian,
> 
> >   2.1 Formal approval of Qname finding
> > 
> >      * [13]qnameAsId-18
> >           + 14 Jan 2004 draft finding "[14]Using Qualified Names (QNames)
> >             as Identifiers in Content"
> > 
> >      [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#qnameAsId-18
> >      [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids-2004-01-14
> > 
> >    At the ftf meeting we did not formally approve NW's finding. Proposed
> >    to publish the 14 Jan draft as an approved finding using the usual
> >    mechanisms.
> 
> It's my recollection that we did infact approve the finding

Sounds right here.

>  - however the
> meeting record [a] does not seem to record that decision :-(
>
> I raised the question of publishing approved TAG findings as TR page (WG)
> Notes. That discussion did not resolve.
> 
> As things stand it seems that we should publish the approved finding in our
> 'traditional' manner. 
> 
> If recollections differ on approval then we can make the decision again,
> sigh.

I'd rather that the ftf record showed a decision to approve the finding.

>  Otherwise, we should simply ask Norm to 'fix-up' the status section
> and announce the revision as normal.
> 
> > -- 
> > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> > Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
> 
> Stuart
> --
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 08:21:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:25 GMT