- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:15:22 -0500
- To: 'Norman Walsh' <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
As we go, it is also the first question to ask of the browser: what namespaces do you support composably as a replacement for sniffing the vendor and version. Sort of a regress to the days of looking for NOTATION decls. len From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Norman Walsh Well, a vocabulary that never gets processed probably isn't very useful. I see your point that it's a processing issue, but it's also true that if you want to enable low(er)-cost extensibility, that's a goal that will have an impact on your language design.
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 14:15:54 UTC