Fwd: XML Extensibility and versioning

Does this relate to the XMLVersioning-41 issue?

http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#XMLVersioning-41

Al

>From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
>To: www-qa@w3.org
>Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:18:29 +0200
>Subject: XML Extensibility and versioning
>X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/1090509509.4569.1778.camel@stratustier
>
>XML.com published an article from Dare Obasanjo [1] yesterday, about XML
>Extensibility and Versioning; I've only skimmed through it, but it seems
>to touch on several of the points that SpecGL tries to address in
>extension and deprecation applied to the specific case of XML languages.
>
>It would be great if someone had the time to look further on whether
>some of the points in the article should inspire new good practices or
>techniques in SpecGL; I may end up doing it next week, but would love to
>see contributions from others :)
>
>Dom
>
>1. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/07/21/design.html
>--
>Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
>W3C/ERCIM
>mailto:dom@w3.org
>
>
>Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
>Content-Description: Ceci est une partie de message
>	numériquement signée.
>

Received on Thursday, 22 July 2004 14:24:41 UTC