W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2004

Re: RDDL2 Background

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:58:37 -0500
To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1074553116.1674.1.camel@jammer>

On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:51, Eric van der Vlist wrote:
[...]
> > So I cooked up RDDL2, which used the existing mechanisms in XHTML and 
> > had a whole lot less markup, and I thought did a lot better job of 
> > hitting the 80/20 point.
> 
> I don't think so, unless all my (real world) use cases are outside your
> 80%.

pointers to a few such cases, please?

I haven't studied RDDL1 enough to know if it's better or worse; I
suspect either would meet my needs.

But I'm always interested in real world cases.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 19 January 2004 17:59:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:23 GMT