W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2004

RE: Revised draft finding: Authoritative Metadata

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:16:12 -0800
Message-ID: <33D970235519324D988AFFDE7EA2E24C01315F31@RED-MSG-41.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>

>  - Addressing comments from Paul Cotton about means of
>    obtaining user consent.

Thanks.

>  * Beginning of 4.1 now explains better what user consent
>    means and ways to achieve it.

This meets my objectives.  Thank you very much for doing this without me
supplying candidate text.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of
> Ian B. Jacobs
> Sent: February 18, 2004 3:36 PM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Revised draft finding: Authoritative Metadata
> 
> Dear www-tag,
> 
> I've revised the finding "Authoritative Metadata" [1] based
> on reviews from Roy Fielding [2] and Stuart Williams [3].
> The primary changes from the 27 Jan 2004 draft were:
> 
>  - Almost wholesale incorporation of Roy's text, with
>    some edits.
>  - Almost wholesale incorporation of Stuart's comments.
>  - Addressing comments from Paul Cotton about means of
>    obtaining user consent.
> 
> Highlights:
> 
>  * The abstract and summary of key points is clearer. I did
>    edit RF's text in section one to phrase the links to later
>    sections as questions raised by the architectural points.
>  * Third scenario added (section 2.3); some text taken from
>    section 5.
>  * More rationale behind the role of metadata and the choice
>    of making sender metadata authoritative. Per suggestion from
>    SW, list a couple of other potential sources of metadata.
>  * Removed firewall example from 3.3
>  * Replaced pretty printing example in 3.3., last bullet,
>    with URI checking example
>  * Beginning of 4.1 now explains better what user consent
>    means and ways to achieve it.
>  * Moved some subsections of 4 around for readability.
> 
> I created a diff file but it wasn't very useful. Sections
> 6 and 7 did not change.
> 
> You are invited to review and comment on this revision.
> Thank you,
> 
>  - Ian
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/mime-respect-20040218
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Feb/0008
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Feb/0007
> 
> --
> Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2004 18:17:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:55:50 GMT