RE: [xmlChunk-44] Chunk of XML - Canonicalization and equality

There seems to be some question as to whether xml:lang (and maybe xml:base)
survive the canonicalisation process. See [1] and thread.

Stuart
--
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0013.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu] 
> Sent: 3 February 2004 15:11
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [xmlChunk-44] Chunk of XML - Canonicalization 
> and equality
> 
> 
> At 11:22 PM -0500 2/2/04, Ian B. Jacobs wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >At their 2 Feb 2004 teleconference, the TAG accepted a new issue [1]:
> >
> >xmlChunk-44: Chunk of XML - Canonicalization and equality
> >
> 
> Is this XML fragments under another name? That is, what do 
> you mean by "chunk"?
> 
> Also, how is this not solved by exclusive XML 
> canonicalization? It seems to me two "chunks" are likely to 
> be equal if they have the same exclusive XML canonicalization.
> 
> I don't yet see what's new about this issue.
> -- 
> 
>    Elliotte Rusty Harold
>    elharo@metalab.unc.edu
>    Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
>    http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
>    
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosi
> m/cafeaulaitA
> 

Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:25:13 UTC