W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2004

[Agenda] 19 Apr 2004 TAG teleconf (TAG ftf, AC mtg, LC issues)

From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:07:43 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1082063262.1179.5.camel@seabright>
Hello,

The agenda for the TAG's 19 April 2004 teleconf is
available as HTML [1] and as text below.

 _ Ian

[1] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/19-tag.html

==================================================
                  Agenda for 19 April 2004 TAG teleconference

1. Administrative (30min)

    1. Roll call. Regrets: SW. Chair: NW
    2. Proposed to accept the minutes of the [7]29 Mar teleconference
       Completed Action IJ 2004/03/29: Remove a side comment per SW's
       suggestion in 22 March minutes.
    3. Accept this [8]agenda?
    4. Next meeting: 26 April?

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/29-tag-summary.html
      [8] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/19-tag.html

  1.1 May TAG ftf meeting in Boston

    1. See [9]meeting page
    2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Look for more advice from W3C Team on
       suggested hotels ([10]Done)

      [9] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/12-tag-mtg.html
     [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Mar/0090.html

  1.2 May AC meeting in New York

    1. [11]Registration[12], Agenda
    2. [13]Draft TAG report to AC, from SW
    3. Presentation (17 May, 16:30, for 45 minutes including discussion)
         1. Topics?
              1. Flavor of LC comments? Biggest issues?
         2. Presenters?

     [11] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34257/NY04/
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/16-AC-agenda.html
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/04/13-Draft-AC-Report

  1.3 Revised TAG Charter (10-15 minutes MAXIMUM)

     * Action PC/IJ: Proposed revised [14]TAG charter ([15]Proposed)
     * Get AC Rep input?

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/19-tag
     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Apr/0012.html

2. Technical (60min)

   See also [16]open actions by owner and [17]open issues.

     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1

  2.1 Top Level Domains used as filters (.xxx, .mobile, etc.)

    1. Action CL 2004/03/29: Send a draft to www-tag explaining why the
       .mobile proposal is misinformed. If the TAG supports the proposal,
       send to ICANN on the official mailing list.
    2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Talk to DJW about sending a proposal to the
       TAG (focusing on social issues) that the TAG could review and
       possibly endorse. Progress; I chatted with DJW. We are working on
       a position statement.

  2.2 Web Architecture Document Last Call

   Resources:
    1. [18]Last Call issues list ([19]sorted by section)
    2. [20]Annotated version of WebArch
    3. Archive of [21]public-webarch-comments
    4. [22]List of actions by TAG participant
    5. Additional actions
         1. Action IJ 2004/02/09: Incorporate editorial suggestions (see
            minutes of that meeting for details).

     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/concerning.html
     [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/webarchWithIssues.html
     [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/actions_owner.html

   Actions 2004/03/15 (due 25 March?) to review sections:
     * Norm: I volunteer for section 3 ([23]Proposed)
     * TBL: I volunteer 2 hours starting at start of section 2
     * Roy: I volunteer to look at section 2
     * Stuart: I volunteer starting at section 2.3
     * Mario: I will look at section 4

     [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Apr/0011.html

     _________________________________________________________________

   The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line.

3. Status report on these findings

   See also [24]TAG findings
     * [25]abstractComponentRefs-37:
          + 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[26]Abstract Component References"
     * [27]contentPresentation-26:
          + 30 June 2003 draft finding "[28]Separation of semantic and
            presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
            architecturally sound"
     * [29]metadataInURI-31
     * [30]siteData-36
          + "[31]There is no such thing as a Web site"

     [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
     [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
     [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
     [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
     [31] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36

4. Other action items

     * Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396.
     * Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly
       on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
     * Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san

     _________________________________________________________________


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2004/04/15 21:05:08 $
   W3C | [1]TAG | Previous: [2]29 Mar teleconference | Next: 26 April

      [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/
      [2] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/29-tag-summary.html

                  Agenda for 19 April 2004 TAG teleconference

   Nearby: [3]Teleconference details  [4]issues list ([5]handling new
   issues) [6]www-tag archive

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/#remote
      [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html
      [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2003Jul/0054.html
      [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/

1. Administrative (30min)

    1. Roll call. Regrets: SW. Chair: NW
    2. Proposed to accept the minutes of the [7]29 Mar teleconference
       Completed Action IJ 2004/03/29: Remove a side comment per SW's
       suggestion in 22 March minutes.
    3. Accept this [8]agenda?
    4. Next meeting: 26 April?

      [7] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/29-tag-summary.html
      [8] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/19-tag.html

  1.1 May TAG ftf meeting in Boston

    1. See [9]meeting page
    2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Look for more advice from W3C Team on
       suggested hotels ([10]Done)

      [9] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/12-tag-mtg.html
     [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Mar/0090.html

  1.2 May AC meeting in New York

    1. [11]Registration[12], Agenda
    2. [13]Draft TAG report to AC, from SW
    3. Presentation (17 May, 16:30, for 45 minutes including discussion)
         1. Topics?
              1. Flavor of LC comments? Biggest issues?
         2. Presenters?

     [11] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34257/NY04/
     [12] http://www.w3.org/2004/05/16-AC-agenda.html
     [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/04/13-Draft-AC-Report

  1.3 Revised TAG Charter (10-15 minutes MAXIMUM)

     * Action PC/IJ: Proposed revised [14]TAG charter ([15]Proposed)
     * Get AC Rep input?

     [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/07/19-tag
     [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2004Apr/0012.html

2. Technical (60min)

   See also [16]open actions by owner and [17]open issues.

     [16] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/actions_owner.html
     [17] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?view=normal&closed=1

  2.1 Top Level Domains used as filters (.xxx, .mobile, etc.)

    1. Action CL 2004/03/29: Send a draft to www-tag explaining why the
       .mobile proposal is misinformed. If the TAG supports the proposal,
       send to ICANN on the official mailing list.
    2. Action IJ 2004/03/29: Talk to DJW about sending a proposal to the
       TAG (focusing on social issues) that the TAG could review and
       possibly endorse. Progress; I chatted with DJW. We are working on
       a position statement.

  2.2 Web Architecture Document Last Call

   Resources:
    1. [18]Last Call issues list ([19]sorted by section)
    2. [20]Annotated version of WebArch
    3. Archive of [21]public-webarch-comments
    4. [22]List of actions by TAG participant
    5. Additional actions
         1. Action IJ 2004/02/09: Incorporate editorial suggestions (see
            minutes of that meeting for details).

     [18] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/issues.html
     [19] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/concerning.html
     [20] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/webarchWithIssues.html
     [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/
     [22] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/lc1209/actions_owner.html

   Actions 2004/03/15 (due 25 March?) to review sections:
     * Norm: I volunteer for section 3 ([23]Proposed)
     * TBL: I volunteer 2 hours starting at start of section 2
     * Roy: I volunteer to look at section 2
     * Stuart: I volunteer starting at section 2.3
     * Mario: I will look at section 4

     [23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Apr/0011.html

     _________________________________________________________________

   The TAG does not expect to discuss issues below this line.

3. Status report on these findings

   See also [24]TAG findings
     * [25]abstractComponentRefs-37:
          + 30 Oct 2003 draft finding "[26]Abstract Component References"
     * [27]contentPresentation-26:
          + 30 June 2003 draft finding "[28]Separation of semantic and
            presentational markup, to the extent possible, is
            architecturally sound"
     * [29]metadataInURI-31
     * [30]siteData-36
          + "[31]There is no such thing as a Web site"

     [24] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings
     [25] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#abstractComponentRefs-37
     [26] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/abstractComponentRefs-20031030
     [27] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#contentPresentation-26
     [28] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/contentPresentation-26-20030630.html
     [29] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/open-summary.html#metadataInURI-31
     [30] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#siteData-36
     [31] http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/01/08/WebSite36

4. Other action items

     * Action RF 2003/10/08: Explain "identifies" in RFC 2396.
     * Action DC 2003/11/15: Follow up on KeepPOSTRecords with Janet Daly
       on how to raise awareness of this point (which is in CUAP).
     * Action CL 2003/10/27: Draft XML mime type thingy with Murata-san

     _________________________________________________________________


    Ian Jacobs for Stuart Williams and TimBL
    Last modified: $Date: 2004/04/15 21:05:08 $

-- 
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                     +1 718 260-9447

Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 17:07:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:25 GMT