W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2003

RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract

From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:35:20 -0500
Message-ID: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9ECDF@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com>
To: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@apache.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: 'Tim Berners-Lee' <timbl@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org

Then be patient.  This isn't a trivial document and 
these are not trivial terms.  

Why is a term from the field of visualization of 
topical clustering introduced into a document describing 
the web architecture?   Provide the definition for 
the abstraction so the scope is clear.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@apache.org]

Sandro, they are two topics: one is the space, the other is visualizing
that space.  That page says it is talking about maps of information
spaces.  That is just like the AAA handing out maps of physical roads,
though a bit harder to visualize because the geography isn't forced
into a mostly-flat-spherical plane. The relations within and between
information create a space.  This *is* a common term in the area of
Web architecture and it should be used when appropriate.

Please, can we just be a tad less oversensitive about ontologies
on this list?  Half the time I can't carry on even the most trivial
conversations with other TAG members without being interrupted.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 09:35:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:21 GMT