> "Information space" still has a mystical incantation > kind of feel. +1 Google does not suggest it's a well-understood term. For instance, we have Clay Shirky saying, in a class syllabus for "Thinking about Networks": Week 4. Visualizing Networks I What is "information space"? How can you visualize an N-dimensional network in 2D space? 3D space? What visual tools and techniques are there for representing networks? -- http://stage.itp.tsoa.nyu.edu/~cs97/tan/#classes I don't know what Dr. Shirky thinks "information space" is, but the fact that he puts scare quotes around it, and covers it under visualization, suggests he's using it differently from the TAG. When last I visitted this topic, I came up with an informal definition... The idea of an information space is that information can be collected into units, and these units can be arranged to somehow be navigable. -- http://www.w3.org/2002/11/webarch4/v3.html ... but without such a definition, I think using the term does more harm than good. -- sandroReceived on Wednesday, 24 September 2003 10:57:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:01:59 GMT