- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:09:57 -0500
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 14:19, Ian B. Jacobs wrote: > Hello, > > The 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft of "Architecture of > the World Wide Web" is now available at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20030918/ I recall from the Vancouver meeting... "Ian: yes, I intend to make "on the web" a term" -- http://www.w3.org/2003/07/21-tag-summary.html but I don't see it in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2003/webarch-20030918/#index Also, this seems like a category error: "...leading to design choices that constrain the behavior of the Web in order for the system to achieve desired properties: to be an efficient, scalable, shared information space..." It's either a system or a space, not both, right? That's the impression I got from Roy's msg of Aug 08 2003 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Aug/0044.html I got the impression that Roy was arguing to define the Web as a space, *not* a system: | The problem with defining the Web as an information | system rather than an information space is that people start | making global assumptions about traits that are only applicable | to one system that uses the Web of resources. [...] > If there are no strong objections from the TAG, I dunno if this is a "stop ship" objection or not... I can live without making "Web" and "on the Web" into first-class terms, myself, and I haven't read the whole thing yet. But from the perspective of checking that this draft is consistent with the proceedings of the group, this looks like a problem. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 22 September 2003 16:09:58 UTC